Spider uses bioluminescence from fireflies as bait to capture new prey

Study reveals that "Araneus ventricosus" manipulates light signals emitted by captured animals to attract more males into its web

20.08.2024 | 14:58 (UTC -3)
Schubert Peter, Cultivar Magazine
Photo: 池田正樹 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0
Photo: 池田正樹 - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0

Researchers discovered that the spider Araneus ventricosus, known for spinning orb webs, uses a deceptively sophisticated form of communication to capture its prey, especially male fireflies of the species Abscondita terminalis. The behavior was revealed through a study that investigated how spiders manipulate the bioluminescent signals emitted by fireflies already trapped in their webs, transforming them into live bait to attract more prey.

While most predators actively move in search of their prey, Araneus ventricosus adopted a more passive and resourceful approach. It takes advantage of the bioluminescence of male fireflies, which normally emit light signals to attract females during mating. When trapped in the spider's web, these captured males begin to emit light signals that resemble those of females, attracting other males to the same trap.

The researchers carried out field experiments using a 2x2 design, which involved the presence or absence of the spider in the web and whether or not the captured male fireflies emitted light signals. The results showed that the capture rate of free male fireflies was significantly higher when there were visible light signals emitted by already captured fireflies in the presence of a spider.

Detailed analysis of the signals emitted by captured fireflies revealed that, in the presence of a spider, these males modify their light emission patterns, using only one flashlight instead of two and emitting single pulse signals, which are more characteristic of the signals emitted by fireflies. females. This suggests that the spider, possibly through its bites, is able to manipulate the fireflies' neurotransmitters, causing them to emulate typical female signals and thus attract more males to the web.

The study also ruled out the hypothesis that these modified signals were merely signs of distress or warning flashes between males. The data showed that free-ranging males were more often attracted to webs that contained captured spiders and fireflies compared to webs that contained only fireflies.

The researchers observed that the spider adopted a specific behavior when dealing with captured male fireflies that were still emitting light. 81,8% of the time, the spider performed a sequence of biting and coiling attacks at regular intervals, while the fireflies continued to emit light even during the attack.

The study reveals a sophisticated form of interspecies communication, where the spider Araneus ventricosus uses light signals from its prey to deceive and capture more fireflies. The findings suggest that the spider's venom or bites may be altering the signaling patterns of captured fireflies, turning them into bait that tricks other males.

This research opens new perspectives on how predators can use signals from their prey to improve their hunting strategies, demonstrating a previously underestimated complexity in predator-prey interactions. Further studies will be needed to fully understand the neurobiological mechanisms behind this signal manipulation.

More information on doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.07.011

(A) Spider surrounding male firefly, displaying visible flashes from its flashlights. (B) Male firefly entangled in a spiderless web, exhibiting luminescence in one of its two lanterns (indicated by an arrow). (C) Spider with two entangled male fireflies, one of which has a luminescent flashlight (indicated by arrow). (D) Ventral view of a male firefly showing the two lanterns on its abdomen. (E) Ventral view of a female firefly showing a single luminescent lantern on her abdomen. (F) Free male firefly with both luminescent lanterns. (G) Female firefly with her single luminescent lantern. (H) Spider feeding on a male firefly wrapped with its lanterns darkened using paint. (I) Male firefly wrapped with its darkened lanterns. Bars: 5 mm (A–I). (J) Free male firefly (four flash sequences, each consisting of multipulse flashes). (K) Female firefly (single pulse flashes). (L) Male firefly trapped in a web with a spider (single pulse flashes). (M) Male firefly trapped alone in a web (single pulse flashes). The flash duration for multi-pulse flash trains from free male fireflies is the time elapsed from the start of the pulse to the end of the pulse. The inter-flash interval is the time elapsed from the end of one pulse to the start of the next pulse. The flash period is the sum of the flash duration and the inter-flash interval. Flash rate is the number of flashes per second. (N) Comparison of the number of male fireflies trapped in spider webs in different treatments using post-hoc multiple comparisons. S+F+ (N = 43): firefly in a web with a spider (flashes visible). S+F– (N = 37): firefly in a web with a spider (ventral abdominal lanterns off). S–F+ (N = 52): firefly alone in a web, flashes visible. S–F– (N = 29): neither a spider nor a firefly present in a web. Significant differences are denoted by different lowercase letters (P < 0,05). (O–R) Bioluminescent signal characteristics of fireflies compared, with one-way ANOVAs conducted for females (N = 7), free males (N = 14), males entangled in a web with a spider (S+F+ males: N = 16) and males entangled alone in a web (S–F+ males: N = 7). (O) Flash duration (F3,40 = 16,03, P < 0,0001). (P) Flash interval (F3,40 = 32,81 P < 0,0001). (Q) Flash period (F3,40 = 41,29, P < 0,0001). (R) Flash rate (F3,40 = 43,11, P < 0,0001). Post-hoc HSD multiple pairwise comparisons: S+F+ males not significantly different from females; for all flash characteristics except flash interval, S–F+ males significantly different from S+F+ females and males. Different lowercase letters indicate differences in significance (P < 0,05) in the data. The boxplots (N–R) show the median (center line), first and third quartiles (box), and minimum and maximum values ​​(whiskers).
(A) Spider wrapping around male firefly, displaying visible flashes of its flashlights. (B) Male firefly entangled in a spiderless web, displaying luminescence in one of its two lanterns (indicated by an arrow). (C) Spider with two entangled male fireflies, one of which has a luminescent flashlight (indicated by arrow). (D) Ventral view of a male firefly showing the two lanterns on its abdomen. (E) Ventral view of a female firefly showing a single luminescent lantern on her abdomen. (F) Free male firefly with both luminescent lanterns. (G) Female firefly with her single luminescent lantern. (H) Spider feeding on a male firefly wrapped with its lanterns darkened using paint. (I) Male firefly wrapped with its darkened lanterns. Bars: 5 mm (A–I). (J) Free male firefly (four flash sequences, each consisting of multipulse flashes). (K) Female firefly (single pulse flashes). (L) Male firefly trapped in a web with a spider (single pulse flashes). (M) Male firefly trapped alone in a web (single pulse flashes). The flash duration for multi-pulse flash trains from free male fireflies is the time elapsed from the start of the pulse to the end of the pulse. The inter-flash interval is the time elapsed from the end of one pulse to the start of the next pulse. The flash period is the sum of the flash duration and the inter-flash interval. Flash rate is the number of flashes per second. (N) Comparison of the number of male fireflies trapped in spider webs in different treatments using post-hoc multiple comparisons. S+F+ (N = 43): firefly in a web with a spider (flashes visible). S+F– (N = 37): firefly in a web with a spider (ventral abdominal lanterns off). S–F+ (N = 52): firefly alone in a web, flashes visible. S–F– (N = 29): neither a spider nor a firefly present in a web. Significant differences are denoted by different lowercase letters (P < 0,05). (O–R) Bioluminescent signal characteristics of fireflies compared, with one-way ANOVAs conducted for females (N = 7), free males (N = 14), males entangled in a web with a spider (S+F+ males: N = 16), and males entangled alone in a web (males S–F+: N = 7). (O) Flash duration (F3,40 = 16,03, P < 0,0001). (P) Flash interval (F3,40 = 32,81 P < 0,0001). (Q) Flash period (F3,40 = 41,29, P < 0,0001). (R) Flash rate (F3,40 = 43,11, P < 0,0001). Post-hoc HSD multiple pairwise comparisons: S+F+ males not significantly different from females; for all flash characteristics except flash interval, S–F+ males significantly different from S+F+ females and males. Different lowercase letters indicate differences in significance (P < 0,05) in the data. Boxplots (N–R) show the median (center line), first and third quartiles (box), and minimum and maximum values ​​(whiskers)

Cultivar Newsletter

Receive the latest agriculture news by email

access whatsapp group